Fast Neural-Network Surrogate Model of the Updated Multi-Mode Anomalous Transport Module for NSTX-U
B. Leard, S.M. Morosohk, Z. Wang, T. Rafiq, E. Schuster
30th IEEE Symposium on Fusion Energy
Oxford, UK, July 9-13, 2023
The Multi-Mode Module (MMM) is a theory-based anomalous transport model
that is used in integrated codes to predict the electron/ion temperature,
electron/impurity density, and toroidal/poloidal rotation profiles of
tokamak plasmas. It includes transport driven by a variety of electron
and ion scale modes and accounts for the effects of collisions, fast-ion
and impurity dilution, non-circular flux surfaces, finite beta, and Shafranov
shift [1]. Due to the large number of interconnected physical phenomena
captured by MMM, it is a computationally intensive code, unsuitable for
control applications that require real-time or faster-than-real-time prediction
speeds. Therefore, significant effort has been dedicated to the development
of neural-network (NN)-based surrogate models for tokamaks like DIII-D [2]
and EAST with the goal of reproducing a selected set of MMM’s output predictions
at a much faster speed. In this work, a NN model for MMM9.1 is trained based
on predictions within the NSTX-U operating regime. This model, referred
to as MMMNet, is capable of predicting the ion, electron, and impurity
thermal diffusivities, electron particle diffusivity, and toroidal and
poloidal momentum diffusivities. The newer MMM9.1 version improves the
accuracy, consistency, speed, and physics basis of several components
of MMM that are critical for NSTX-U as well as for the spherical-tokamak
reactor concept. The MMM training data is based on NSTX experimental shots
and adapted to suit the NSTX-U geometry and to cover the entirety of the
NSTX-U parameter space. In simulation testing, MMMNet is shown to have
a similar accuracy to MMM while running at a fraction of its computation
time. This makes MMMNet suitable for real-time control applications. When
integrated into the Control Oriented Transport SIMulator (COTSIM), the
plasma-profile prediction accuracy is improved without compromising computational
speed.
[1] T. Rafiq et al., Phys. Plasmas 20 032506 (2013).
[2] S.M. Morosohk et al., Nucl. Fusion 61 106040 (2021).
*Supported by the US DOE (DE-SC0021385).